Salary negotiations are never predictable. Imagine that you are a sales rep with a company that is getting hit hard by a financial crisis. No one has been laid off yet, but everyone is nervous about that possibility. In an effort to save jobs, your sales manager has quietly proposed that everyone take lower base salaries, along with more performance-based pay and other pay that would be contingent on the company’s future performance.
Salary Negotiation Skills – Asking for a Higher Salary
Aligning incentives and creating win-win bargaining situations
Efforts to “variable-ize” costs that have historically been fixed are becoming more commonplace especially during times of economic uncertainty. For developing negotiation strategies, standard theory suggests a number of reasons this shift might benefit both you and your company. For example, performance-based pay can better align incentives between the company and the individual, potentially leading to higher performance and improvements in the company’s bottom line. In the long run, the company might also attract sales reps who are optimistic about their own or the company’s performance, enhancing a “win-win” negotiation situation.
Three Things to Consider in Salary Negotiations
Before your boss implements this type of change, however, there are three important costs to consider:
1. Destructive competition.
If performance is measured individually rather than collectively, your boss’s proposal might inhibit desirable teamwork within the sales force. Although the context is somewhat different, this is what happened at the venerable investment bank Lazard in the 1990s. The “eat what you kill” approach to compensation led to infighting that almost destroyed the bank until CEO Bruce Wasserstein installed a new compensation system in 2003.
2. Behavior-distorting kinks.
Another potential problem with performance-based incentives is that you might create “kinks” that distort individual behavior. For example, Harvard Business School professor Ian Larkin has found that sales reps who are paid based on quarterly performance will drop prices in the few days just before the quarter ends, often to the detriment of the organization. To comply with arcane salary cap rules, football players in the National Football League often have contracts with lots of kinks. The result is frequent concern that athletes are “playing to the contract” instead of doing the right thing for the team. Thus, your boss should be vigilant for kinks and smooth them over, if possible.
For more information on contract negotiations or download our negotiation free report Win-Win or Hardball: Top Strategies from Sports Contract Negotiations, drawn from the latest negotiation research from the Negotiation Briefings newsletter.
3. The “Joe Torre” problem.
Economic models typically assume that individuals are driven solely by financial incentives, but human nature is more complex than that. Extrinsic motivation, such as performance-based pay, can interfere with intrinsic motivation – the simple desire among professionals to do a good job.
In one case, a company offered a bonus to a top manager it was recruiting if he could start earlier than the previously negotiated start date. The employer intended this to be a show of goodwill, as it would be sharing the large value that the manager would add by coming on board sooner. Yet the manager was insulted by the suggestion that he needed financial incentives to start as soon as possible.
This type of disconnect apparently played a major role in the departure of longtime New York Yankees manager Joe Torre. Back in 2007 contract negotiations with the Yankees owner George Steinbrenner, Torre walked away from an incentive-laden negotiated agreement because he felt that it implied he wasn’t trying hard enough to win a World Series. The lesson: Before switching to a new pay system, carefully think through the pros and cons.
How do you handle salary negotiations? Leave a comment below.
Originally published February 14, 2012.