A Win Win Negotiation Case Study Using Mind Mapping Negotiation Skills

A win win negotiation case study using a data-based dispute resolution method

By on / Negotiation Skills

negotiation case study

Here is a win win negotiation case study using mind mapping, a negotiation skill you should consider adding to your negotiation and conflict management strategies.

In an article in the Wall Street Journal, Zack Anchors describes how financial advisor Rob O’Dell of Wheaton Wealth Partners of Wheaton, Illinois used the unconventional technique in an attempt to help a client negotiate the sale of his shares of the family business to his younger brother, who hoped to pass the business on to his children.

The brothers had become embroiled in a dispute about who was more responsible for the business’ success and how to fairly split its assets. The conflict was spilling over to cause divisions within the extended family.


Build powerful negotiation skills and become a better dealmaker and leader. Download our FREE special report, Negotiation Skills: Negotiation Strategies and Negotiation Techniques to Help You Become a Better Negotiator, from the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.


“It was an ugly business divorce with a lot of moving parts,” O’Dell told Anchors. “There were other siblings involved who didn’t have ownership in the business, there was real estate, there were family dynamics and some complicated business finances.”

The brothers needed to better understand one another’s perspective, O’Dell realized. To help them do so, he drew upon mind mapping, a technique for diagramming complex information. A mind map begins with a central idea. Related ideas or sets of information are linked to the central idea as branches. O’Dell, who had been using mind-mapping software to help manage his firm, realized he might be able to apply it to help resolve his client’s dispute.

Win Win Negotiation Case Study: Collaboration, Not Antagonism, at the Bargaining Table

In a meeting with the brothers, O’Dell created a mind map with the family business located at its center. Working together, the three men added branches to the map (working on a computer with a large monitor) that included the business’ interests, assets, and liabilities. A branch about commercial real-estate holdings, for example, extended smaller branches that listed property taxes, valuation, and other figures.

“The brothers entered the negotiation with a competitive attitude, believing they had to fight for what they deserved,” writes Anchors. “But the process of creating the mind map required participation and collaboration, rather than confrontation.” As the screen filled, it became apparent that their interests overlapped.

The brothers reached a negotiated agreement that satisfied them both. O’Dell now uses mind mapping with all of his clients. Negotiators who would like to give this novel application a try can find free mind-mapping tools on the Internet.

Mind-mapping is not the only data-based decision-making approach for negotiators to employ as part of an an effective negotiation strategy. Decision trees and scoring systems are two other negotiation skills that you can use for conflict resolution. Working together on such analyses helps parties abandon their combative mindsets and adopt a collaborative, integrative negotiations approach to dispute resolution at the negotiation table.

What do you think about this negotiation case study? Share your thoughts in the comments.


Build powerful negotiation skills and become a better dealmaker and leader. Download our FREE special report, Negotiation Skills: Negotiation Strategies and Negotiation Techniques to Help You Become a Better Negotiator, from the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.


Related Negotiation Skills Article: Conflict Management – Evenhanded Decision Making

Originally published July 2013.

Related Posts

Comments

8 Responses to “A Win Win Negotiation Case Study Using Mind Mapping Negotiation Skills”

  • Ralph B.

    I like the idea of mind mapping for negotiation. I use it for problem solving, brainstorming, and preparing presentations and it works well.

    Reply
  • Mike R.

    Have to endorse the use of mind mapping when negotiating. I have been using it for over 20 years and many of my students and trainees bring their mind mapping skills to the course and apply when preparing, planning strategies, taking face to face notes, analysing interests and concerns.

    It is one of a number of data / info / notetaking methods we use.

    Reply
    • Keith L.

      Excellent to hear that it has been effective for you in practice!

      Best,
      Keith

      Reply
  • Jeremy B.

    I have been using live MindMapping in Mediations and facilitated negotiations for some time. Parties appreciate the clarity and having the issues set out and then resolved in front of them.
    The MindMap at the end of the sessions is in fact the outline of the agreement.

    Reply
  • Liam H.

    This is absolutely spot on, and a great example of how mind maps can be used to great effect in negotiation, both in helping to plan your approach in advance, but also in the mapping of different perspectives/positions to get clarity.
    Readers might find it useful to see a number of negotiation mind map templates and examples available to view/download here: http://www.biggerplate.com/groups/view-group.aspx?groupid=173

    Reply
  • SolidNegotiaton

    Visualisation techniques in general are extremely helpful in negotiation situations. The toolbox should also include concept mapping, flow charting, 2×2 matrices and system dynamics. lucky that for all of them inexpensive and great software tools are available.

    Reply
  • Randall G.

    Is there anything else that mind mapping is good for?
    I have seen videos that it is good for studying?

    Could it be useful in business?

    Reply
    • Ernst S.

      @Randall Glass: MindMapping can be used for a whole range of things. It is a good way of taking notes with fewer words, sticking the connections and interdependencies into the lines and using icons and colours. It is also good to develop work breakdown structures or issue trees, refining topics into tasks and subtasks as you go away from the center. Newer systems (not the pure teaching) allow a hybrid of a tree for structure and block text assigned to the individual nodes, which can be used for writing and also be combined with managing sources and citations.

      Reply

Leave a Reply