![]() |
Adapted from “Divide the Pie—Without Antagonizing the Other Side,” by Robert C. Bordone (professor, Harvard Law School), first published in the Negotiation newsletter, November 2006.
Even those who effectively engage in a mutual-gains approach to negotiation, in which parties work together to meet interests and maximize value, can be stymied by the task of dividing up seemingly fixed resources, such as budgets, revenue, and time. The tough distributive, or value-claiming, aspects of a deal can poison the negotiation and destroy business partnerships.
In negotiation, figuring out who should get what is rarely easy, but creative solutions do exist. Consider the legendary “Malice in Dallas.” In 1990, Stevens Aviation, a South Carolina–based aviation sales and maintenance company, began using the advertising slogan “Plane Smart.” In 1991, Southwest Airlines coined the phrase “Just Plane Smart,” and Stevens notified Southwest of the apparent trademark infringement.
The dispute easily could have cost both sides hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees. Instead of bringing in the lawyers, however, Stevens chairman Kurt Herwald came up with a novel approach to resolving the conflict: he challenged Southwest CEO Herb Kelleher to an arm-wrestling match. Whoever won the best of three would earn rights to the slogan, and the loser of each match would make a donation to a charity of the winner’s choice. Kelleher accepted.
On March 20, 1992, several thousand people attended the “Malice in Dallas” at Dallas’s Sportatorium. The event was widely covered by the national media. Stevens’s Herwald won two of the three matches and the right to the slogan.
Shortly after winning, Herwald agreed to let Southwest continue to use its slogan. The companies presented $10,000 to the Muscular Dystrophy Association and $5,000 to the Cleveland Ronald McDonald House. Then-president George H.W. Bush commended them on their “win-win” solution.
Ed Stewart, Southwest’s manager of public relations, estimates that the match saved his company $500,000 in legal fees and generated $6 million in publicity. As for Stevens Aviation, Herwald partially credits the event for his company’s three-year increase in business, from $28 million to more than $100 million.
The upshot: Approaching distributive issues with a creative mindset can not only preserve a relationship but also add significant value for both sides.
Permalink: http://www.pon.harvard.edu/?p=20640
Preparing for Negotiation |
||||
|
Understanding how to arrange the meeting space is a key aspect of preparing for negotiation. In this video, Professor Guhan Subramanian discusses a real world example of how seating arrangements can influence a negotiator’s success. This discussion was held at the 3 day executive education workshop for senior executives at the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School. Guhan Subramanian is the Professor of Law and Business at the Harvard Law School and Professor of Business Law at the Harvard Business School. |
||||
Business Negotiations (172)
Conflict Management (29)
Conflict Resolution (53)
Crisis Negotiations (18)
Dispute Resolution (30)
Mediation (32)
Meeting Facilitation (12)
Negotiation Skills (234)
[...] Lees het oorspronkelijke Engelstalige artikel: “Divide the Pie—Without Antagonizing the Other Side,” door Robert C. Bordone (professor, Harvard Law School), uit de Negotiation newsletter, November 2006. Bookmark on Delicious Recommend on Facebook Buzz it up Tip on Hyves Share on Linkedin Share on nuJIJ share via Reddit Tweet about it Tell a friend This entry was posted in Artikel, Oplossingen in wederzijds belang, Opties genereren, Relaties bouwen. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. « Wanneer onderhandelen beter is dan open aanbesteding [...]