Today more than ever, employees want a meaningful voice in the decisions that affect them. Workers are increasingly seeking input into where and when they work, the responsibilities they take on, the colleagues they collaborate with, and other key aspects of their roles. In this environment, Democratic leadership styles—such as collective leadership and participative leadership—may be especially well suited to boosting job satisfaction and improving retention by giving employees a greater sense of ownership and involvement.
So what, exactly, is participative leadership? Below, we take a closer look at the ins and outs—and the pros and cons—of the participative leadership style.
What Is Participative Leadership?
Participative leadership is a type of democratic leadership style in which subordinates are intentionally involved in organizational decision making. Goals of participative leadership include enhancing employees’ sense of ownership of their work, improving the quality of decisions, and integrating workers’ personal goals with those of the organization, write Qiang Wang, Hong Hou, and Zhibin Li in a 2022 review of participative leadership published in Frontiers in Psychology.
Historically, participative leadership dates back to small, early human societies, where survival depended on collective decision making. As societies shifted toward large-scale agriculture and industrialization, hierarchical leadership structures became more common, in part because coordinating group decisions grew more complex.
Claim your FREE copy: Real Leaders Negotiate
If you aspire to be a great leader, not just a boss, start here: Download our FREE Special Report, Real Leaders Negotiate: Understanding the Difference between Leadership and Management, from Harvard Law School.
n the modern workplace, participative leadership was formally articulated in 1961 by American social psychologist Rensis Likert. Likert outlined three core principles of participative leadership theory:
- The principle of mutual support, which emphasizes trust and confidence between leaders and employees.
- The group decision principle, which commits organizations to shared decision making.
- The high standards principle, which fosters collective responsibility for excellence.
Later, in 1997, Surinder Kahai and colleagues defined participative leadership as a style in which leaders actively seek employee input before making decisions, delegate certain decision-making authority, and encourage joint decision making. Importantly, the degree of authority shared can vary. In most cases, participative leaders consult employees through mechanisms such as discussion, voting, or consensus building, while retaining responsibility for final decisions.
Participative leadership is often contrasted with directive leadership, a more top-down approach in which leaders assign tasks, set expectations unilaterally, and maintain tight control over key decisions.
Research on Participative Leadership
What determines whether a leader or organization adopts a participative leadership style? Wang, Hou, and Li identify a range of individual and organizational factors.
Research suggests that more experienced leaders may be more inclined toward participative leadership than newer or younger leaders. Leaders who score high on self-awareness and emotional intelligence also tend to engage more frequently in participative behaviors. In addition, participative leadership is more likely to emerge when leaders and followers perceive themselves as similar in values, background, or goals.
Organizational culture matters as well. Environments that value learning, psychological safety, and open communication are more conducive to participative leadership than rigid or highly hierarchical settings.
How Participative Leadership Affects Employees
A substantial body of research finds that participative leadership benefits employees’ psychological well-being, increases organizational commitment, and strengthens trust in leadership. When employees help shape decisions, they are more likely to feel invested in both the process and the outcome.
As Corey S. Halaychik writes in Lessons in Library Leadership, employees who participate in decision making often become more motivated to stay with an organization in order to see shared goals realized. They are also more likely to accept—rather than resist—organizational change. “Providing an opportunity for followers to help shape the future creates a strong sense of buy-in,” Halaychik notes.
Participative leadership has also been linked to higher self-efficacy and psychological safety, which can translate into greater creativity, innovation, and performance. At the same time, involving employees more deeply in decision making can increase stress, particularly if participation is added on top of existing workloads. Effective participative leaders must be careful to balance empowerment with realistic expectations and adequate support.
How Participative Leadership Affects Organizations
Most empirical research concludes that participative leadership improves organizational performance and innovation. Compared with directive leadership, participative leadership tends to enhance creativity and the quality of decisions—but often at the cost of efficiency.
This tradeoff is not surprising. With more people involved in decision making, participative leadership requires greater deliberation and coordination. As Halaychik observes, participative leadership is “time intensive.” Leaders must invest time explaining options, sharing information, and soliciting feedback. Employees, in turn, need time to evaluate alternatives and offer thoughtful input.
As a result, participative leadership can slow decision making and make it more difficult to respond quickly under tight deadlines. Group decision processes may also increase the potential for conflict, particularly during the deliberation phase. Leaders must actively promote respectful dialogue and address disagreements constructively.
When managed well, however, participative leadership can yield decisions that are more widely supported, more durable, and more effectively implemented than decisions made unilaterally.
What experiences have you had with participative leadership—positive or negative?
Claim your FREE copy: Real Leaders Negotiate
If you aspire to be a great leader, not just a boss, start here: Download our FREE Special Report, Real Leaders Negotiate: Understanding the Difference between Leadership and Management, from Harvard Law School.
