The first offer in a negotiation often becomes a powerful anchor that influences the entire bargaining process—sometimes more than facts or market data.
Opening offers have a strong effect on price negotiations. The first number put on the table typically serves as an anchor that shapes the discussion that follows. In landmark research on the anchoring effect, psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky found that even random numbers can dramatically influence people’s subsequent judgments and decisions.
Claim your FREE copy: Negotiation Skills
Build powerful negotiation skills and become a better dealmaker and leader. Download our FREE special report, Negotiation Skills: Negotiation Strategies and Negotiation Techniques to Help You Become a Better Negotiator, from the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.
Their research revealed something surprising: even when individuals know a number is arbitrary, it still pulls their estimates in its direction. That insight has major implications for price anchoring in negotiation, whether you’re discussing a salary, selling a home, or negotiating a vendor contract.
Consider a job negotiation. If you enter hoping for $75,000 but the interviewer opens with $50,000, you may counter at $55,000—far below the $80,000 you might have requested had you made the first offer. The initial anchor subtly resets expectations.
So how should you handle anchoring strategically?
The following three guidelines can help you respond to the other party’s price anchoring—and engage in effective anchoring yourself.
- Assess Both Parties’ Knowledge of the Bargaining Zone
Before deciding whether to make the first offer, clarify three core concepts:
- BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement)
- Target (your ideal outcome)
- Reservation point (your walk-away point)
Next, estimate your counterpart’s BATNA, target, and reservation point. This analysis helps define the Zone of Possible Agreement (ZOPA)—the range in which a deal is possible.
When Should You Make the First Offer?
The decision depends on two factors:
- How well you understand the ZOPA
- How well the other party understands it
If the other party likely knows more than you—such as an employer who understands salary bands better than a job candidate—you may struggle to anchor effectively.
However, if you possess superior information (for example, you know far more about the asset’s value than the buyer does), making the first offer can be a powerful strategic move.
How Aggressive Should Your Anchor Be?
A useful guideline:
Anchor at the end of the ZOPA that favors you—but avoid stepping outside the realistic bargaining range. An anchor that’s wildly implausible risks damaging credibility and trust.
- Consider Making a Range Offer
Suppose you’re selling a used car worth approximately $5,000–$6,000. You want to be ambitious without appearing unreasonable.
Should you say:
- “I’m asking $7,000,” or
- “I could sell it for about $6,500 to $7,500”?
Research suggests the range may work in your favor.
In a 2015 study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Daniel R. Ames and Malia F. Mason found that expressing offers as a bolstering range can help negotiators claim more value.
A bolstering range includes:
- Your intended anchor at one end
- A more ambitious number at the other
For example, asking $7,000–$7,500 rather than $7,000 alone.
Why Do Range Offers Work?
- They maintain a strong anchor.
- They signal flexibility.
- They reduce perceptions of aggressiveness.
- They often produce better outcomes in single-issue negotiations.
Range offers can soften the assertiveness of anchoring while still influencing the final agreement.
- Use Very Precise Numerical Anchors
Precision matters.
Research shows that precise first offers outperform round numbers. For example, a home listed at $255,500 is likely to attract higher offers than one listed at $255,000 or $256,000.
In a 2017 study, David D. Loschelder and colleagues found:
- More ambitious first offers produced more favorable outcomes.
- Highly precise offers led recipients to make smaller counteroffers.
- Negotiators making precise offers made smaller concessions over time.
Why Do Precise Anchors Work?
- They signal expertise.
Counterparts perceive precise numbers as informed and data-driven. - They narrow counteroffers.
Recipients adjust less dramatically from precise anchors. - They reduce concession size.
Precise anchors psychologically justify smaller follow-up concessions.
The key takeaway:
Make your anchor ambitious and precise. Don’t let precision water down your aspiration level.
How to Counter the Other Side’s Anchor
If your counterpart anchors aggressively:
- Pause and avoid reacting immediately.
- Re-anchor with your own data-supported number.
- Justify your counteroffer using objective criteria.
- Explicitly name the anchor effect if necessary (“That number doesn’t reflect current market benchmarks…”).
- Focus the conversation on standards, not positions.
Anchors only work if you accept them psychologically. Awareness is your first defense.
Final Thoughts: Anchor With Intention
Price anchoring is not manipulation—it’s influence. And influence is inevitable in negotiation.
The question isn’t whether anchoring happens. It’s whether you will use it strategically—or allow yourself to be influenced by it unconsciously.
By:
- Understanding the ZOPA,
- Considering bolstering range offers, and
- Using ambitious, precise numbers,
you can significantly improve your outcomes in salary negotiations, real estate deals, business contracts, and everyday transactions.
What strategies do you follow when engaging in price anchoring? Share your experience in the comments.
Claim your FREE copy: Negotiation Skills
Build powerful negotiation skills and become a better dealmaker and leader. Download our FREE special report, Negotiation Skills: Negotiation Strategies and Negotiation Techniques to Help You Become a Better Negotiator, from the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.
