Carri Hulet (producer), under the supervision of Lawrence SusskindHighlights of dialogue from a two-day workshop on deliberative democracy and dispute resolution approaches to civic engagement
The Workshop on Deliberative Democracy and Dispute Resolution, sponsored by the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, was a two-day conference held on June 24 – 25, 2005 in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The event brought together 30 individuals who share a common interest in civic engagement, but represent two distinct fields that approach the project very differently. One group included public dispute resolution professionals; the other, political theorists and innovative practitioners of deliberative democracy. The differences between the fields were revealed as participants engaged in four panel discussions regarding hypothetical scenarios depicting difficult moments in democratic practice. Participants shared their opinion on how to approach the problems in the scenario, and discussion ensued.
This video attempts to capture the most interesting moments of dialogue from the workshop in order to illustrate the overlaps and divisions of opinion both between and within the respective fields.
Scenario 1: Municipal Decision-Making
- Exchange 1: Supplementing representative democracy [9:07]
- Exchange 2: Consensus, common interest, stakeholders vs. the public [10:34]
- Exchange 3: The role of the media in deliberative processes [2:56]
- Exchange 4: Visioning [5:22]
- Exchange 5: Participant control over process design [1:46]
Scenario 2: Metropolitan Policy-Making
- Exchange 1: Process questions: role of the mediator, ideal processes, including underrepresented groups [22:09]
- Exchange 2: Rights and Rights-based politics [4:48]
- Exchange 3: Deliberation for the sake of learning rather than policymaking [5:07]
Scenario 3: National-level Consensus Building [3:11]
- Exchange 1: Who should be involved? [9:05]
- Exchange 2: Scientific or technical knowledge in deliberative processes [7:24]
- Exchange 3: EIA and minimum requirements for deliberative democracy [11:51]
- Exchange 4: Dispute Resolution biases [3:16]
Scenario 4: Implementation of Informally Negotiated Agreements [2:20]
- Exchange 1: Legitimacy in the process [9:38]
- Exchange 2: Dispute resolution processes should be long and recursive [9:22]
- Exchange 3: How can I apply deliberative democracy to dispute resolution [5:41]
Closing Comments [4:56]
Deliberative Democracy Meets Dispute Resolution Reflections and Insights from the 2005 Workshop on Deliberative Democracy and Dispute Resolution, Cambridge, Massachusetts Attributes
- Time Required:
- Teaching Notes Available:
- Run Time:
- 2 hours, 31 minutes
- Produced By:
- Carri Hulet
- Program on Negotiation (2006)
PON Teaching Negotiation Resource Center
Soft copy vs. hard copy
You may order this role simulation in either soft copy (electronic) or hard copy (paper) format. If you select the soft copy option, you will receive an e-mail with a URL (website address) from which you may download an electronic file in Adobe Acrobat PDF format. You will have one week to download your materials from when you receive the email. You are then only authorized to use, print, or share the materials as many times as the number of copies you purchase. The TNRC charges for use of this simulation on a per-participant basis. Therefore, you must purchase a separate copy of this simulation for each person who will be participating, regardless of the number of roles in the simulation. You will only receive a link to one electronic file, which includes all general instructions, confidential instructions, and any teaching notes for the simulation. You should separate out the instructions before distributing to participants.
If you select the hard copy option, you will receive paper copies of this role simulation via the shipping method you select.
For additional information about the soft copy option, please visit our FAQ section, or contact the PON Teaching Negotiation Resource Center at email@example.com or 800-258-4406 (within the U.S.) or 301-528-2676 (outside the U.S.).
Please note: At the present time, Teaching Negotiation Resource Center soft copies are compatible with the following versions of the Adobe Acrobat Reader: English, German, French, Spanish, Swedish, Portuguese, Japanese, and Korean. If you have a different version of the Acrobat Reader, you may wish to download one of these at http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html, or contact the PON Teaching Negotiation Resource Center at firstname.lastname@example.org, 800-258-4406 (within the U.S.), or 301-528-2676 (outside the U.S.) for further assistance. This restriction does not apply to the freely available Teacher’s Package Review Copies.
Ordering a single copy for review
If you wish to review the materials for a particular role simulation to decide whether you’d like to use it, a PDF, or soft copy, version of the Teacher’s Package for the simulation is available as a free download from the description page of most role simulations and case studies. All Teacher’s Packages include copies of all participant materials. In addition, some Teacher’s Packages (but not all) include additional teaching materials such as teaching notes or overhead masters.
Ordering copies for multiple participants
To order multiple copies of a role simulation for use in a course or workshop, simply enter the total number of participants in the box next to “Quantity.” There is no need to calculate how many of each role is required.
If you are ordering hard copies, the Teaching Negotiation Resource Center will calculate the appropriate numbers of each role to provide, based on the total number of participants. For example, if you wish to order a 2-party role simulation for use with a class of 30 students, you would enter “30” in the box next to “Quantity.” You then would receive 15 copies of one role and 15 copies of the other role, for use with your 30 participants. As another example, if you ordered 30 participant copies of a 6-party role simulation, you would receive 5 copies of each role.
In the event that the number of participant copies you order is not evenly divisible by the number of roles in the simulation, you will receive extra copies of one or more roles. Participants receiving the extra roles may partner with other participants playing the same role, thus negotiating as a team. So, for instance, if you ordered 31 copies of a 2-party role simulation, you would receive 15 copies of the first role and 16 copies of the second role. One of the participants playing the second role would partner with another participant playing that same role, and the two would negotiate as a team.