Lawrence SusskindAn educational video for mediators or mediation students regarding mediator responsibility when parties have unequal knowledge, skills or power
A 1992 PON Video Lecture
“Anyone who thinks mediation is not manipulation is nuts. It is utter manipulation. But, towards what end? Toward the qualities of an outcome, not toward my notion of the right solution.”
Professor Lawrence Susskind begins his video lecture on mediator responsibility and accountability with these provocative words. Susskind bases his lecture on the principle that mediators have special responsibilities when the parties have unequal knowledge, skills, or power. Drawing on his extensive experience as a mediator and teacher, Susskind offers specific recommendations for how mediators should intervene in such situations.
Susskind argues, for instance, that when parties have unequal knowledge about the rules of the game, about their own interests, about mediation strategy, or about the context and constraints under which they operate, mediators should inform all parties about the mediation process. In addition, mediators should help the parties speak clearly about their interests and inform the parties of the advantages of a principled mediation strategy. Furthermore, Susskind argues that it is the mediator’s role to help parties gain access to information about the constraints involved for all parties. He goes on to offer advice for mediators working with parties with unequal skill levels and unequal power.
Susskind concludes his lecture by discussing mediator responsibility to ask questions that address issues of fairness, efficiency, and stability. While maintaining neutrality, he says, mediators have the responsibility to intervene in order to create agreements that are sustainable and address all parties’ self-interests.
Larry Susskind is Ford Professor of Urban and Environmental Planning at MIT, Visiting Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and President of the Consensus Building Institute. He is also Director of the Program on Negotiation MIT-Harvard Public Disputes Program.
Production Quality: Utility.
Mediator Responsibility and Accountability in Public Disputes Attributes
- Time required:
- 2 Hours
- Teaching notes available:
- Produced by:
- Lawrence E. Susskind
- Run Time:
- 89 minutes
PON Teaching Negotiation Resource Center
Soft copy vs. hard copy
You may order this role simulation in either soft copy (electronic) or hard copy (paper) format. If you select the soft copy option, you will receive an e-mail with a URL (website address) from which you may download an electronic file in Adobe Acrobat PDF format. You will have one week to download your materials from when you receive the email. You are then only authorized to use, print, or share the materials as many times as the number of copies you purchase. The TNRC charges for use of this simulation on a per-participant basis. Therefore, you must purchase a separate copy of this simulation for each person who will be participating, regardless of the number of roles in the simulation. You will only receive a link to one electronic file, which includes all general instructions, confidential instructions, and any teaching notes for the simulation. You should separate out the instructions before distributing to participants.
If you select the hard copy option, you will receive paper copies of this role simulation via the shipping method you select.
For additional information about the soft copy option, please visit our FAQ section, or contact the PON Teaching Negotiation Resource Center at firstname.lastname@example.org or 800-258-4406 (within the U.S.) or 301-528-2676 (outside the U.S.).
Please note: At the present time, Teaching Negotiation Resource Center soft copies are compatible with the following versions of the Adobe Acrobat Reader: English, German, French, Spanish, Swedish, Portuguese, Japanese, and Korean. If you have a different version of the Acrobat Reader, you may wish to download one of these at http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html, or contact the PON Teaching Negotiation Resource Center at email@example.com, 800-258-4406 (within the U.S.), or 301-528-2676 (outside the U.S.) for further assistance. This restriction does not apply to the freely available Teacher’s Package Review Copies.
Ordering a single copy for review
If you wish to review the materials for a particular role simulation to decide whether you’d like to use it, a PDF, or soft copy, version of the Teacher’s Package for the simulation is available as a free download from the description page of most role simulations and case studies. All Teacher’s Packages include copies of all participant materials. In addition, some Teacher’s Packages (but not all) include additional teaching materials such as teaching notes or overhead masters.
Ordering copies for multiple participants
To order multiple copies of a role simulation for use in a course or workshop, simply enter the total number of participants in the box next to “Quantity.” There is no need to calculate how many of each role is required.
If you are ordering hard copies, the Teaching Negotiation Resource Center will calculate the appropriate numbers of each role to provide, based on the total number of participants. For example, if you wish to order a 2-party role simulation for use with a class of 30 students, you would enter “30” in the box next to “Quantity.” You then would receive 15 copies of one role and 15 copies of the other role, for use with your 30 participants. As another example, if you ordered 30 participant copies of a 6-party role simulation, you would receive 5 copies of each role.
In the event that the number of participant copies you order is not evenly divisible by the number of roles in the simulation, you will receive extra copies of one or more roles. Participants receiving the extra roles may partner with other participants playing the same role, thus negotiating as a team. So, for instance, if you ordered 31 copies of a 2-party role simulation, you would receive 15 copies of the first role and 16 copies of the second role. One of the participants playing the second role would partner with another participant playing that same role, and the two would negotiate as a team.