
Price range: $0.00 through $6.50
Sanjana Paul, under the supervision of Professor Lawrence E. Susskind
A two-hour, eight-party, multi-issue negotiation simulation centering on a controversial proposal by DataCenter Inc. to build a 500‑megawatt hyperscale data center in a suburban community.
SCENARIO:
The project promises significant economic benefits—jobs, tax revenue, and tech‑sector growth—but raises serious concerns about energy demand, grid reliability, water use, environmental impacts, and changes to neighborhood character.
In response to intense public scrutiny, the State Siting and Permitting Agency (SSPA) convenes an eight‑member Task Force representing the developer, local government, community residents, environmental advocates, state energy regulators, the renewable energy industry, and the national data center industry. Their mandate is to review the draft Environmental Impact Statement and recommend whether and under what conditions the project should be approved.
Over a structured two‑hour meeting, participants must navigate a packed agenda: making opening statements; discussing environmental issues, economic and community concerns (jobs, tax base, property values, noise, traffic), information gaps and research needs, and stakeholder engagement mechanisms; and, finally, issuing concrete recommendations. The core tensions include whether to allow phased approval tied to grid and environmental performance, how to treat renewable energy accounting, what enforceable safeguards to impose on water use and community quality of life, and how to structure any Community Benefits Agreement and oversight body. The simulation requires participants to reconcile sharply differing priorities—project certainty, environmental integrity, community protection, cost allocation, and regulatory precedent—through multi‑party negotiation, caucusing, and adaptive problem‑solving.
MECHANICS:
This simulation is designed to be conducted in-person or virtually. Including preparation, negotiation, and debrief, the simulation should take approximately two hours.
MATERIALS:
- Teaching Notes
- Draft Environmental Impact Statement
- Response Memo
- General Instructions
- Confidential Instructions for D. Kim, President, Community Residents’ Association
- Confidential Instructions for T. Brooks, Vice President of Policy, National Data Center Industry Association
- Confidential Instructions for R. Chen, Vice President of Infrastructure Development, DataCenter Inc.
- Confidential Instructions for S. Rivera, Director, GreenFuture Alliance (Local Environmental Group)
- Confidential Instructions for J. Reyes, State Siting and Permitting Agency Representative
- Facilitator Guide for J. Reyes, SSPA Representative
- Confidential Instructions for Dr. P. Desai, State Energy Regulatory Commission Representative
MAJOR LESSONS:
- Shifting from positions to underlying interests.
- Using facilitation, caucuses, and process design to unlock movement.
- Defining BATNAs.
- Designing structural solutions to recurring tensions, especially around phased approval.
- Navigating contested technical issues, particularly renewable energy accounting and grid impacts.
- Building enforceable, community-centered agreements through community benefits agreements (CBAs) and oversight mechanisms.
- Embedding joint fact-finding and adaptive learning into long-term deals.
Data Center Negotiation Attributes
| Time required: | 2 hours |
|---|---|
| Numbers of participants: | 8 |
| Scoreable: | No |
| Teaching Notes Available: | Yes |
| Neutral third party present: | No |
