international negotiation

The following items are tagged international negotiation.

mediator

Posted by & filed under Glossary.

An impartial, mutually acceptable third party whose goal is to help conflicted parties resolve their dispute. Mediators lack the power to coerce or bargain, but they can use facilitative power to influence disputants. (Michael Watkins and Susan Rosegrant, Breakthrough International Negotiations [Jossey-Bass, 2001], 93)

integrative negotiation

Posted by & filed under Glossary.

Negotiations in which there is a potential for the parties’ interests to be integrated in ways that create joint value or enlarge the pie. Integrative negotiation is possible when the parties have some shared interests or opportunities to realize mutual gains through trades across multiple issues. (Michael Watkins and Susan Rosegrant, Breakthrough International Negotiations [Jossey-Bass,

arbitrator

Posted by & filed under Glossary.

An impartial third party with the coercive power to impose terms on the disputants. An arbitrator is not biased in favor of either party and subordinates personal preferences to some set of rules or values. Nor does a pure arbitrator have a sufficient stake in the outcome to bargain with the disputants. (Michael Watkins and

Multiparty Negotiation: Four Volume Set

Posted by & filed under News, Reviews of Books.

Edited by Professors Lawrence E. Susskind and Larry Crump, this collection makes a strong case for how and why multiparty negotiation should be treated as a distinct field of study. The editors argue that multiparty negotiations exhibit at least three features that distinguish them from two-party negotiations: coalitional behavior, demanding process management requirements, and highly

Modern Tribes — The New Lines of Loyalty

Posted by & filed under News.

SEPT. 11, 2001, was a haunting symptom of a much larger global challenge.

The predominant form of conflict in the world is no longer international, and the traditional tools of diplomacy are no longer as effective. So how should we deal with this new reality?

Read Dan’s op-ed at the Boston Globe.

Daniel L. Shapiro, on the faculty

Complementary Approaches to Coexistence Work: Focus on Coexistence and Human Rights

Posted by & filed under News.

A new publication by Eileen Babbitt and Kristin Williams is available from Coexistence International. This paper, Complementary Approaches
to Coexistence Work: Focus on Coexistence and Human Rights (pdf, 251KB), focuses on the potential for the fields of of coexistence and human rights to cooperate and share tools and strategies in order to mitigate both inter-group violence

Complementary Approaches to Coexistence Work: Focus on Coexistence and Human Rights

Posted by & filed under News.

A new publication by Eileen Babbitt and Kristin Williams is available from Coexistence International. This paper, Complementary Approaches to Coexistence Work: Focus on Coexistence and Human Rights, focuses on the potential for the fields of coexistence and human rights to cooperate and share tools and strategies in order to mitigate both inter-group violence and human

Breakthrough International Negotiation

Posted by & filed under News, Reviews of Books.

Playing for high stakes — in politics, business or everyday life — demands “breakthrough” negotiation, according to Michael Watkins, professor at the Harvard Business School, and Susan Rosegrant of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. Their new book, Breakthrough International Negotiation: How Great Negotiators Transformed The World’s Toughest Post-Cold War Conflicts (San Francisco:

HLS Students Win First Place in International Negotiation Competition

Posted by & filed under News.

On April 6, three Harvard Law School students took home the first place trophy from The Negotiation Challenge in Leipzig, Germany. René A. Pfromm, LL.M. ’08, Jessica Price ’08 and Stefan A. Neata ’08, were part of the winning team comprised of HLS students and students from UC Hastings College of the Law.

The students are

The Greatest Weapons in Iraq

Posted by & filed under News.

A growing number of U.S. military commanders have come to recognize that stabilizing the insurgent and sectarian violence in Iraq necessitates dealing with population stability and civil support. As the army’s new operations manual itself states, “Winning battles and engagements is important, but alone is not sufficient. Shaping the civil situation is just as important