bargaining

Bargaining or haggling is a type of negotiation in which the buyer and seller of a good or service dispute the price which will be paid and the exact nature of the transaction that will take place, and eventually come to an agreement. Bargaining is an alternative pricing strategy to fixed prices. Optimally, if it costs the retailer nothing to engage and allow bargaining, he can divine the buyer’s willingness to spend. It allows for capturing more consumer surplus as it allows price discrimination, a process whereby a seller can charge a higher price to one buyer who is more eager (by being richer or more desperate). Haggling has largely disappeared in parts of the world where the cost to haggle exceeds the gain to retailers for most common retail items. However, for expensive goods sold to uninformed buyers such as automobiles, bargaining can remain commonplace.

The following items are tagged bargaining.

ZOPA

Posted by & filed under Glossary.

Zone of Possible Agreement: The bargaining range created by the two reservation values. The ZOPA defines a “surplus” that must be divided between the parties. (Robert H. Mnookin, Scott R. Peppet and Andrew S. Tulumello, Beyond Winning [Belknap Press, 2004], 19)

WATNA

Posted by & filed under Glossary.

Worst Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement: In a negotiation, your WATNA represents one of several paths that you can follow if a resolution cannot be reached. Like its BATNA counterpart, understanding your WATNA is one alternative you can use to compare against your other options along alternative paths in order to make more informed decisions

averaging

Posted by & filed under Glossary.

An inter-personal bargaining tendency for resolving a group-action problem in distributive negotiation whereby the final agreement is roughly the average amount of the initial offer and any subsequent counteroffers. (Howard Raiffa, The Art and Science of Negotiation [Harvard University Press, 1982], 300-01)

Bargaining with the Devil and other Ongoing Research

Posted by & filed under Harvard Negotiation Research Project.

Ongoing research includes the following: Bargaining with the Devil, Negotiating Ethnic Conflict and the Israeli Settlements Projects.

Bargaining with the Devil
Professor Mnookin is working on a new book project: Bargaining with the Devil: What to Do When the Stakes Are High and the Other Side Seems Evil.  By “devil” is meant an enemy who may have

Why We Strike

Posted by & filed under Conflict Resolution, Daily.

What happens when disputants feel like they have invested too much in a conflict to back down?

There are a number of reasons that negotiations fail and lead to protracted strikes, often to the detriment of both parties.

Both sides frequently believe that their case is stronger due to overconfidence. If one side doubts the other’s claims

Alternative Dispute Resolution In-House: Mediation, Arbitration, or Med-Arb?

Posted by & filed under Daily, Dispute Resolution.

Alternative Dispute Resolution In-House: Mediation, Arbitration, or Med-Arb?

When faced with an in-house conflict, alternative dispute resolution or ADR can be invaluable to managers. The three most common ADR techniques are: mediation, arbitration, and med-arb. However, it can often be difficult to determine which method is best for your particular situation.

Here are four possible objectives you

The New Conflict Management: Effective Conflict Resolution Strategies to Avoid Litigation

Posted by & filed under Freemium.

This report reveals how wise negotiators extract unexpected value using an indirect approach to conflict management. An aggressive management style can set you up for repeated failure. Direct conflict management approaches can be overly combative and counter-productive. Experienced negotiators know that compromise seldom succeeds. Win/lose is really lose/lose. The best negotiation strategy results in a deal that works for all parties.