| | |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
News & Archive![]() (August 23, 2006)
Wednesday, September 20, 2006 Please join Professor Emeritus Frank Sander for the first Dispute Resolution Forum (DRF) of the 2006 - 2007 academic year. Why are some jurisdictions so receptive to mediation and others so indifferent or even hostile to it? Can we develop some kind of metric (the MRI or Mediation Receptivity Index) to measure the extent to which a particular jurisdiction has institutionalized mediation (as well as other ADR processes)? How would such an index be constituted and administered? What collateral benefits might accrue from formulating such an index?
Professor Sander has served in numerous positions related to the role and future of the American court system, including national and state councils and committees. He has also served as a labor arbitrator for over 35 years and is on the roster of the American Arbitration Association, the Federal Medication and Conciliation Service, and the Massachusetts State Board of Conciliation and Arbitration. In addition, he has served as a grievance mediator for AT&T and the Communications Workers of America, and as a mediator of franchise disputes for the CPR Institute of Dispute Resolution. Professor Sander was also appointed by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to serve on the Standing Committee on Dispute Resolution. He is presently working on the fifth edition of his pioneering dispute resolution course book. Please RSVP to clodge@law.harvard.edu. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2008 The President and Fellows of Harvard College. Privacy Policy | Harvard Law School |