Selling an Agreement to Constituents

In hostage situations, where a decision to negotiate is itself controversial, selling a agreement to one's constituents is often as difficult as selling it to the other side.

Mindful of this obstacle, HNP drafted possible statements that the Iranian and the US governments could make to their citizens after reaching an agreement.

 

Possible Iranian Statement

During the past year, Iran has asked from the United States nothing more than that to which in our view Iran is entitled under international law, morality, custom, and the right of self-determination.

  1. We wanted the world to be aware of the grievances which Iran suffered from more than 25 years under Mohammed Reza, who was actively supported by the United States Government;
  2. We insisted that the Shah not be free to live abroad in luxury while the Iranian people suffered from the results of his reign;
  3. We demanded that the United States Government fully accept the Iranian revolution;
  4. We demanded a firm commitment from the United States Government never again to intervene in our internal affairs;
  5. We demanded an end to economic warfare against the Iranian people;
  6. We demanded assurance that no more punitive action would be taken against Iran by the United States;
  7. We insisted that the United States cooperate in helping locate public funds wrongfully removed from Iran by the ex-Shah;
  8. We demanded that the 'nest of spies' -- the U.S. Embassy compound from which CIA aided the Shah -- be closed and that future diplomatic facilities be established only by agreement with the Islamic Republic of Iran.

On all these points we have now succeeded. The ex-Shah has gone to face a judgment far more severe than any we could impose upon him. The United States has now accepted all the above demands. The U.S. hostages no longer serve any useful purpose here, and they are accordingly being returned to their families.

 

Possible U.S. Statement

I am pleased to announce that all American hostages held in Iran since last November have now left Iran and are on their way home to the United States.
The release of the hostages constitutes a great success for the principled steadfastness of the American people and of the hostages themselves. In connection with their release I would like to make three major points:

  1. We paid no blackmail. The American people have shown that they will not be coerced. We refused to turn over the Shah; we refused to pay ransom of any kind. Iran is receiving no more than that to which they would have been entitled under our own interpretation of international law if they had not taken the hostages.

  2. Iran has been punished. As the result of measures taken by the United States and other countries, Iran's economy is in a disastrous state. Its international prestige has never been lower. Domestically the government is beset by infighting and disarray. Thus, Iran has paid a high price for its outrageous action. In return, they have gotten nothing that they could not otherwise have obtained much sooner.

  3. The stability of the region is more important than further punishment of Iran. Although Iran may deserve still more punishment, we must give higher priority to the United States' long term security interests in that part of the world. Ending our dispute with Iran will strengthen the independence and security of all the peoples of the Gulf region and reduce the risk of Soviet intervention. While we must not forget the past -- the courageous steadfastness of the hostages and the bravery of those who gave their lives trying to rescue them -- we need now to look to the future.
    Accordingly, the Government of Iran has been informed that the official policy of the United States toward Iran shall be as follows, effective immediately:
    ......

 

Back to top
Copyright © 2006 Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College.   This website and the materials on it
are protected by copyright and may not be used or reproduced for other than personal use without written permission.