- Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School - http://www.pon.harvard.edu -

Negotiating for Continuous Improvement: Monitor and Assess Your Negotiation Skills

Posted By PON Staff On July 11, 2012 @ 3:10 pm In Negotiation Skills | No Comments

Many organizations subject their executives to rigorous performance reviews, yet few companies include negotiation effectiveness as one of the core competencies they track. Instead, negotiation is usually subsumed under categories such as “emotional intelligence,” or “persuasiveness.” The negotiator-related questions posed in most “36-degree assessments” don’t measure the right skills and abilities, such as preparation. When evaluators do assess negotiations, they typically rely only on post hoc accounts and overlook the details of the bargaining experience.

To accurately track improvements in a manager’s negotiation capabilities, someone must monitor how that person is doing – before, during, and after several key negotiations. Before a negotiation begins, it’s useful to review how well an executive prepared. Did she spend enough time thinking not only about her own interests but also about those of the other side? Did she clarify her organizational mandate, including her authority to make commitments? Did she identify options for mutual gain to put on the table at the appropriate moment?

When it comes to assessing the negotiation itself, you should strive to find out how well the employee listened to the other side’s concerns and how nimble she was in revising her sense of the other side’s priorities in light of offers made. What kind of relationship did she build? How effective was she at creating value? Following the negotiation, did the manager coordinate adequately within the organization to ensure implementation of the agreement? Was she able to deal with surprises – changes in the business environment not covered in the agreement when they occurred?

Even if a company ensures that its managers receive formal negotiation reviews and timely feedback, the question of how to measure performance can be perplexing. Did the executive create enough value to warrant high marks for performance? Upper management should set explicitly benchmarks internally before putting any performance system in place. Bristol-Myers Squibb not only has instituted such benchmarks for negotiation performance but also trains senior managers on how to use them and how to best offer constructive criticism. The key: Reward self-criticism; don’t punish it. Negotiation performance reviews should help managers become their own best critics.


Article printed from Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School: http://www.pon.harvard.edu

URL to article: http://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/negotiation-skills-daily/uous-improvement-monitor-and-assess-your-negotiation-skills/

Copyright © 2008 Negotiation Daily. All rights reserved.