Members: Please log in.

Text size: Small font Default font Larger font

.
Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School;

Avoid conflict and broken trust

November 28, 2011
Edited by: PON_Staff, filed in: Conflict Resolution
.
  • Comments
  •  
  • Print This Post
.
Avoid conflict and broken trust

While negotiations are inherently risky, there are proven ways to reduce risk and improve your odds of success. To do so, you must focus on the very basis of your relationship with the other party: trust.

Think about a time when you lost trust in a fellow negotiator. Did you try to renegotiate the terms of the relationship, or did you ignore the problem and hope it would go away? Did you adjust the extent to which you trusted him? We often enter into negotiations with an assumption of trust—an assumption we carry through our relationship with the other party. When things go wrong, as they often do, we are typically unwilling to renegotiate the terms of the relationship for fear of destroying the very basis of trust. After all, when you communicate a loss of trust, the other side is unlikely to take this change in stride. The resulting anger and hurt feelings can leave you worse off than if you had not trusted at all.

As Nobel Prize–winning professor Daniel Kahneman of Princeton University and the late Amos Tversky of Stanford University showed, people generally dislike departures from the status quo. In contrast, when negotiators build trust incrementally, a healthy skepticism signals merely a lack of trust, not a betrayal signaled by loss of trust.

When you begin talks with someone new, it’s important to discuss ground rules—including the basic beliefs about trust that you both bring to the table. Rather than assuming mutual trust, explain that you are a conservative risk taker who prefers to build trust slowly over the course of a relationship.

Communicating your preference for building trust over time avoids the need to signal mistrust later on. Consider that many patients find it hard to tell their longtime doctor they want a second opinion, fearing the doctor will be offended and perhaps even give them inferior care in the future. But if you tell a doctor during your first checkup that you value second opinions and make them standard procedure, you will avoid this uncomfortable situation.

Adapted from “How Much Should You Trust?” by Iris Bohnet (professor, Harvard Kennedy School) and Stephan Meier (professor, Columbia Business School), first published in the Negotiation newsletter, March 2006.

.

Return to top

  • Comments
  •  
  • Print This Post
.

Social Media:

Would you like us to inform you when new Posts become available?

Post Your Comments and Responses

One Response to “Avoid conflict and broken trust”

  1. AHTL on November 30th, 2011 at 3:25 pm  Rate comment:  Add karma Subtract karma  +0

    “…it’s important to discuss ground rules—including the basic beliefs about trust that you both bring to the table.” Perhaps, definition and elaborate what are these recommended ‘Ground Rules?

    Thanks and cheers.

Return to top

Stay Connected to PON:

Preparing for Negotiation

Understanding how to arrange the meeting space is a key aspect of preparing for negotiation.  In this video, Professor Guhan Subramanian discusses a real world example of how seating arrangements can influence a negotiator’s success.  This discussion was held at the 3 day executive education workshop for senior executives at the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School.

 

Guhan Subramanian is the Professor of Law and Business at the Harvard Law School and Professor of Business Law at the Harvard Business School.

.